On 9/4/07 1:14 PM, "Matt Sergeant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4-Sep-07, at 12:43 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>
>> I was playing around a bit on the weekend, yes. Since neither Matt nor
>> Ask have cried out in horror on what I did,
>
> FWIW I didn't object simply because it seems so pointless with
> everyone having such conflicting ideas about what this should all be
> about.
>
There seems to be consensus that a/n {connection|session|transaction} id
would be useful.
Would it be possible to implement ->id as a hook? The actual key could then
be left to the creativity of the user. The plugin could then implement the
other hooks and tune the id as necessary (connect, mail, queue, etc.).
peter
