On 11 Apr 2018, at 1:10 am, Scott Bloom <[email protected]> wrote: > > Looking at the scintilla example app SciTE some of the functionality has been > brought over to QScintilla, however Im looking for the commenting > functionality, which has not been brought over. > > Unfortunately, it seems to rely on properties that are not set for the lexers > in the QScintilla. > > For instance, “Block Commenting or Uncommenting” gets the characters to use > from the property “comment.block.cpp” which is not set, as QScintilla relies > on the base LexCPP.cpp for comment analysis. > > Maybe Im trying to hard, but it should be possible to do. > > Thoughts?
QScintilla is not a port of SciTE, although there are features in common. As SciTE will use the low-level Scintilla API it should be possible to implement anything in a QScintilla based editor that is implemented in SciTE. Phil _______________________________________________ QScintilla mailing list [email protected] https://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/qscintilla
