BTW Marco, it appears people on twitter agree on this sentiment (don't know if you check it regularly or not).
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:23 PM, <vivai...@gmail.com> wrote: > I recommend you to use the harmattan component set. It's the best looking > one at this time. > > On 10/10/11 9:11 PM Marco Martin wrote: > > Hi all, > I was wondering what are the "official" QtComponents those days... > where is the QtComponents development headed those days? is it still active? > I am looking to implement a platform set for the KDE Plasma widgets (and > Plasma Active, they will probably end up in two separate sets) atm we have > the > most basic widgets like Button, Slider checkboxes and what not... > > but i'm wondering what we should follow for implementing a standard api. > is https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTCOMPONENTS-200 still the central > reference? > > i see the qt-components gitorious repository is still having commits, mostly > in the MeeGo set (i assume the qtcomponents gallery that comes preinstalled > in > the N950 is the gallery example application from that repo) so, if i want to > implement an api compatible set should i look at the meego set? (that seems > to > have much more stuff compared to what is in the bug report, and something > seems quite platform specific) > > Cheers, > Marco Martin > _______________________________________________ > Qt-components mailing list > Qt-components@qt.nokia.com > http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-components > > _______________________________________________ Qt-components mailing list Qt-components@qt.nokia.com http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-components
