On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Daniel Teske <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday 13 Feb 2012 14:10:23 you wrote: >> 13.02.2012, 16:13, "Daniel Teske" <[email protected]>: >> > On Monday 13 Feb 2012 11:21:55 ext Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >> >> Hi Qt Creator developers, >> >> >> >> From organizational point of view, if one contributes to Qt Creator >> >> alternative version of CMake build system plugin with better >> >> integration quality but at a price of static linking to CMakeLib >> >> (increasing binary size on ~7 Mb), will it have a chance to be accepted >> >> into mainline? >> > >> > Well, I'd like to have qt creator not depend on having the cmake sources >> > available. That's not unsolveable. >> >> Sorry, I've read this sentence but couldn't understand if you were opposed >> to using of CMakeLib in Qt Creator or not. > > It just states that Creator should not depend on cmake sources being > available. There are multiple ways to accomplish that even if the cmake plugin > needs CMakeLib. > > daniel
Im not sure what there is to be gained here. CMake is a language - it executes, and poops out a project file. As a qtcreator/cmake user Im happy for qtcreator not to be *smart* about cmake, infact I'd prefer it be kept that way. All qtcreator needs to do is load that project file correctly, which, I should add - it currently does not do (it misses includes and defines from CMake), IMHO this should be first priority to get working. -- - Campbell _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
