Kostya, Hi! Could you please provide sources for test?
28 марта 2012 г. 7:03 пользователь Konstantin Tokarev <[email protected]> написал: > > > 13.02.2012, 16:13, "Daniel Teske" <[email protected]>: >> On Monday 13 Feb 2012 11:21:55 ext Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >> >>> Hi Qt Creator developers, >>> >>> From organizational point of view, if one contributes to Qt Creator >>> alternative version of CMake build system plugin with better integration >>> quality but at a price of static linking to CMakeLib (increasing binary >>> size >>> on ~7 Mb), will it have a chance to be accepted into mainline? >> >> Well, I'd like to have qt creator not depend on having the cmake sources >> available. That's not unsolveable. >> >> If those 7 MB are for a release build, then yes that would be a problem, as >> that is more then double the size of the biggest plugin now. > > Hi Daniel, > > I have working CMakeLib-based fork of CMakeProjectManager. Total size of > plugin with statically linked CMakeLib is 3.5 M (on Linux). > > It runs CMake's configure function in a background thread with nice progress > bar > (like with QMake) and provides some other benefits as compared with original > plugin: > * Defines > * No intermediate Code::Blocks project is generated > * Direct access to cache variables through CMake API instead of manual cache > file > parsing in old plugin > * CMake re-parsing runs in background thread (with progress bar) and > doesn't block GUI > * (planned) cmake-gui style cache variable configuration on project settings > page > > > So, what can you propose to overcome dependency on CMake sources? > > > > -- > Regards, > Konstantin > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
