On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:11 AM, Joerg Bornemann <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/09/2012 13:58, ext Christian Kandeler wrote: > >> I don't understand the logic of this last sentence. People who use Qt >> won't use C++11? > > This implication was not intended. > Let there be program P, with P entirely based on Qt. Let F_P be the set > of C++ features P uses, F_MS be the set of C++ feature MSVC supports and > F_GW the set of C++ features MinGW supports. > Proposition: F_P = F_P \cap F_GW \cap F_MS > \Rightarrow > there's no reason to build P using MinGW on Windows. >
Who cares about C++ features? gcc 4.7 is a better compiler than MSVC2010, so unless Microsoft has gotten off their collective behinds with 2012 it's likely that gcc 4.7 is going to be a better compiler than that, too. The problem is with MinGW's standard libraries, not with the compiler. /s/ Adam _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
