On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:35 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Who cares about C++ features? gcc 4.7 is a better compiler than MSVC2010, > > so unless Microsoft has gotten off their collective behinds with 2012 it's > > likely > > that gcc 4.7 is going to be a better compiler than that, too. The problem > > is with > > MinGW's standard libraries, not with the compiler. > > Define 'better' . I'm right now having the joy to more or less continuously > compile Qt 5 with different MinGW variants, and it's really, really, dog slow. > > (MSVC is slow too, compared to gcc on Linux. But MinGW gcc takes slowness > really to the next level...) > > who is aware that this is now pretty off topic ... > Actually... I do not believe this is completely of topic. You claim that mingw is slow and you are *very* against it (you spoken about it on several threads). I assume that your opinion is very valid - since this is what you do on a daily basis.
What can you recommend for hobbiest on win32? clang? Other "free=no-cost" compiler available on windows that can compile Qt4/5+QtCreator+my_cool_qt_app ? _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
