On 23/08/2013 09:37, Coda Highland wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Nicolas Arnaud-Cormos > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 22/08/2013 17:43, El Mehdi Fekari wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 22/08/2013 16:49, "Koehne Kai" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Is there a use case for using the Qnx plugin without the BlackBerry one Š >>> >>> >>> Yes. Many developers develop for the QNX Car (2) Platform using the Qnx >>> plugin, and does not use the BlackBerry plugin code. >> >> And also all the people who are using Qnx on their embedded device, >> instead of Linux or WinCE. >> > > That wasn't quite the question being asked. The question isn't, "who > uses the QNX plugin but doesn't use the Blackberry features," but > rather, "is there a QNX use case that is harmed by having the > Blackberry features in the same plugin?"
Keeping Qnx and BlackBerry together is the same as putting the Qnx plugin in the Linux Remote plugin: it does not harm, but does not have any sense. The two are targeting different group of developers, have different unofficial maintainers. Nicolas -- Join us in October at Qt Developer Days 2013! - https://devdays.kdab.com Nicolas Arnaud-Cormos | [email protected] | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
