On 23/08/2013 10:09, Tobias Hunger wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > On 23.08.2013 09:49, Nicolas Arnaud-Cormos wrote: >> Keeping Qnx and BlackBerry together is the same as putting the Qnx >> plugin in the Linux Remote plugin: it does not harm, but does not have >> any sense. > > Then why do it if it does not cause harm? > > On the other hand new plugins do introduce some (usually small) cost. > Kai already explained why. > > In addition there is the cost of somebody doing the change and somebody > else (and that will most likely be me in the current setup) having to > review it. So far I have not seen an argument that justify those > investments of time and energy.
Ok, then let's keep it as is, and move on. Thanks for the feedbacks, Nicolas -- Join us in October at Qt Developer Days 2013! - https://devdays.kdab.com Nicolas Arnaud-Cormos | [email protected] | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-independent software solutions _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
