Creator doesn't build software. It's not a compiler. So you are not depending on it to build anything, actually.
It would seem to be that someone in your company is confused about compilers :-) On 23/01/14 20:16, Adam Light wrote: > All but one developer at my (smallish) company is still using OSX 10.6.8 > because we need 10.6 to be able to build the current shipping version of > our main product. We all use Qt Creator, so a Creator 3.2 that would not > work on 10.6 would be a problem for us. > > Adam > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 4:29 AM, Daniel Teske <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Let's make this: > > Qt Creator 3.2: > > - drop support for compiling & running Qt Creator on 10.6 > > > We want to start using C++11 also in Qt Creator, and 10.6 is the > only thing > > preventing that. Since 10.6 is deployment target only for Qt, we > don’t > > necessarily need to keep “its IDE” running there (yes, that’s a > Qt-centric > > way of looking at Qt Creator). > > a actual independant proposal (since it doesn't really depend on what qt > supports) and cross post it to qt-creator for some wider exposure. > > Actually using C++11 would also mean bumping the minimum supported > compiler > for *compiling* Qt Creator. That's somewhat separate, but I would > assume we > would require at least lamba and auto support for compiling Qt > Creator 3.2. > > That means MSVC 2010, clang 3.1 or g++ 4.5 if I remember correctly. > > daniel > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
