On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 23:51:48 -0500 Eric Feigenson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi nsf... > > I think there's a bug in your emacskeys.pro file. > > There are two lines: > > QTCREATOR_SOURCES = $$(QTC_SOURCE) > > and > > IDE_BUILD_TREE = $$(QTC_BUILD) > > which I think should be: > > QTCREATOR_SOURCES = $$QTC_SOURCE > > and > > IDE_BUILD_TREE = $$QTC_BUILD > > In their original form, if I try to set QTC_BUILD or QTC_SOURCE to correspond > to my local directory trees, they're not seen in those assignment statements. > > I'm also having some build errors, and I'll get back to you if I work those > out. > > Thanks! > > -Eric Hi. Well, it was created using the Qt Creator templates (i.e. File -> New File or Project -> Libraries -> Qt Creator Plugin). So, maybe it's a bug there. Parts you're talking about were generated by it, I haven't really touched it. As for build errors - have no idea what it could be. In any case there is a Change uploaded to the gerrit, you may want to try it as well: https://codereview.qt-project.org/79598 In the Change there are no QTC_SOURCE and all that stuff, it's integrated into the Qt Creator build system. Perhaps it will work better (or at all). I'm building it on a bleeding edge system (latest Qt 5 versions) using the most recent Qt Creator git version, maybe that's the reason why it doesn't work for you. Syntax changes in the qmake? Don't know. Well, I really hope it'll end up being integrated, otherwise I can only offer doing binary builds as I said. But I must say it's not that easy due to all the linker versioning in glibc/libstdc++ mainly. But I'll set up the VM with ubuntu or something and do the right thing. It'll take some time though. _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
