Thanks Eike! It was hard to get that subtle difference in the qmake doc. The clarification is much appreciated!
-Eric On Mar 4, 2014, at 2:09 AM, Ziller Eike <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mar 3, 2014, at 5:51 AM, Eric Feigenson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi nsf... >> >> I think there's a bug in your emacskeys.pro file. >> >> There are two lines: >> >> QTCREATOR_SOURCES = $$(QTC_SOURCE) >> >> and >> >> IDE_BUILD_TREE = $$(QTC_BUILD) >> >> which I think should be: >> >> QTCREATOR_SOURCES = $$QTC_SOURCE >> >> and >> >> IDE_BUILD_TREE = $$QTC_BUILD > > a) The $$(QTC_SOURCE) requires you to set an *environment* variable > QTC_SOURCE. > > b) $$QTC_SOURCE is the syntax for a *qmake* variable (that you e.g. pass as > parameter to qmake) > > That’s the subtle difference between > > a) QTC_SOURCE=/foo/bar qmake -r > > and > > b) qmake -r QTC_SOURCE=/foo/bar > > ;) > > I suppose the templates could be changed to allow either environment > variables or qmake variables > > Br, Eike > >> In their original form, if I try to set QTC_BUILD or QTC_SOURCE to >> correspond to my local directory trees, they're not seen in those assignment >> statements. >> >> I'm also having some build errors, and I'll get back to you if I work those >> out. >> >> Thanks! >> >> -Eric >> >> On Mar 2, 2014, at 1:30 PM, nsf <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 04:15:02 +0600 >>> nsf <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, everyone. >>>> >>>> If you're an emacs user and googled for "qt creator emacs keys" or >>>> something like that, you know that there is some plugin on the github, >>>> that is based on FakeVim, you can find it here: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/fberger/emacskeys >>>> >>>> However, it seems like it's a dead one. Frankly, I don't like the way it >>>> looks (messy) and I haven't checked if it still works or not. >>>> >>>> So.. I created a new one. From scratch. You can find it here: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/nsf/emacskeys >>> >>> Hello again. >>> >>> I think the plugin reached the point where I can say it's stable. Sadly, >>> I haven't received any feedback regarding actual usage, but I'm using it >>> everyday myself. If there is an interest to merge it to the qt creator, >>> I'm ready to cooperate. I've registered the gerrit account, signed the >>> CLA, and created a change here: >>> >>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,79598 >>> >>> If for some reason it won't be accepted, I promise that I'll start >>> doing binary releases at some point. At least 64-bit linux and windows >>> builds. >>> >>> Thank you for your attention. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Qt-creator mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qt-creator mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > > -- > Eike Ziller, Senior Software Engineer - Digia, Qt > Digia Germany GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 13, D-12489 Berlin > Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Anja Wasenius > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin. Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, > HRB 144331 B > _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
