On 07.03.2014 11:54, Daniel Teske wrote: > On Friday 07 Mar 2014 11:42:30 Tobias Hunger wrote: >> On 04.03.2014 14:09, Daniel Teske wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> since we have branched 3.1 from master, master no longer needs to support >>> OS X 10.6. As such I propose, that we open up master for those C++11 >>> features that are supported by VS 2010, g++ 4.5 and clang 3.1. >> That is the list that is used for Qt 5, but why can't we go for >> something a bit newer? > Because it makes no difference in which parts of C++11 we can use. VS 2010 > limits what we can use, g++ 4.5 and clang 3.1 are simply the first versions > that more or less support a superset of VS 2010's support.
So, why is it necessary to support VC 2010? MSVC is the most foreign compiler in QtCreator-land, and it should not be the limiting factor. Peter > > As I wrote in my initial mail, in practice I would expect no one to use those > compilers any more. > >> I am no Windows user, maybe we can just bump the requirement to MSVC >> 2012 there? That would be a huge step forward for our C++11 support! > No, I think it's too early for that. > > daniel > _______________________________________________ > Qt-creator mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator > _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
