16.01.2016, 18:09, "Peter Kümmel" <[email protected]>: >> 2. Exisiting code base (including core components) was relicensed to much >> more restrictive license. I *personally* see this as a negative change, >> however I guess it as a necessary precondition for point #1 to happen. > > But who uses internal QtCreator libraries in his product? This would be > the usecase for LGPL. But QtCreator is a all-or-nothing app not a > node.js, so GPL is here maybe really better.
E.g. look at Eclipse RCP which became a foundation for lots of open-source and commercial products. -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
