On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 07:47:14AM -0500, Coda Highland wrote: > >> two words: qmake sucks. > qmake doesn't suck. :/ > it does.
the "grammar" for anything more complicated is questionable, to say the least. the behavior in quite some corner cases is bizzare - and because of backwards compatibility, many things cannot be reasonably fixed. the code is a complete nightmare, making real maintenance quite tough work. in particular, getting that thing to be reasonably fast (esp. under windows) is something nobody managed to do yet. > >> and, btw, qmake is semi-officially slated for end-of-life, but > >> nothing concrete is planned yet. > > That's a shame, indeed. > don't worry, it will be supported at least for the entire qt 4.x series, of which no end is to be seen yet. we also have no replacement envisioned - we are simply dissatisfied with the current solution and are evaluating alternatives. _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
