On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:15:42AM -0500, Coda Highland wrote: > That said, you tempt me. Oh, you tempt me. :P > have fun. ;)
> I'd still like to see the replacement tool be as easy to use and > extend as qmake; cmake is a serious pain but the KDE zealots are so... > zealous. :P > that's an interesting statement for me. because i made the exact opposite experience - just have a look at the pro files in creator/share/* . but then, maybe that's because i'm a kde zealot. ;) (and no, i don't like cmake files - they look arcane). > I'm sad to hear that the Trolls themselves don't like qmake. > not all of them. actually, there are only two rather small groups who seriously dislike it: those who have to use it for serious stuff and those who maintain it. ok, so by all practical means, that's the same group. :D but there is a reason why it hasn't been documented through all these years ... > I've been defending it for years because it really IS one of the best > tools out there for the typical project. > well, as far as i'm concerned, that's not exactly a reassuring verdict regarding the build tool landscape as a whole. which we happen to agree with ... :} _______________________________________________ Qt-creator mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
