Børge Austvold wrote: > Hi, > > Well how about this then, I've reimplemented both the Java and the C++ > version to be identical. They both use arrays and only brushes are > cached since it's not a good idea to new stuff during painting. Now I > get 20.7 fps in Java and 15.3 fps in c++ on my Ubuntu box running on a > Dell M90 laptop, thats about 35% faster in Java....
You did configure your Qt C++ with -release, right? Gunnar _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
