Gunnar Sletta wrote: > Børge Austvold wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Well how about this then, I've reimplemented both the Java and the >> C++ version to be identical. They both use arrays and only brushes >> are cached since it's not a good idea to new stuff during painting. >> Now I get 20.7 fps in Java and 15.3 fps in c++ on my Ubuntu box >> running on a Dell M90 laptop, thats about 35% faster in Java.... > > You did configure your Qt C++ with -release, right? > > Gunnar > No forgot that, but when I build it with the release flag i got 15.7 fps on the c++ version. (CONFIG += release) right ?
-=Børge _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
