> Good idea. > > How about adding information on getting Qt itself to compile against, if you > have not thought of that already. At least information on any considerations > needed to get a full compile going as quickly as possible. >
Even though a bit sparse, I added some info about what you should do to get going with compiling your own version of QtJambi 4.6 if that's what you're looking for. You may find this in the bottom of http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-jambi/pages/Home I now have a stable compile setup on 2.6.24-24 32bit Linux kernel using gcc 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 8.04 server) and Windows XP 32bit using MSVC 2005. I would like to share some binary builds with the people wanting to play with Jambi without having to go through the build steps, but I don't have any good place to upload them. Also, I'm struggeling a bit with generating a full set of javadoc, which would be nice to put into the package. What about creating a plain Google Code project for Qt Jambi to at least share these? So far, our best shot was codehaus, but they seem to ignore my pleas for shelter :-/ There are of course other alternatives like sourceforge and java.net, but google code seems to be the easiest to use and most the most popular these days. Guess the bug tracker isn't much to talk about compared to Jira, but it could be a nice start until some better alternative comes along... What do you think? Helge _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
