Hi Helge, > Even though a bit sparse, I added some info about what you should > do to get going with compiling your own version of QtJambi 4.6 if > that's what you're looking for. You may find this in the bottom of > > http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-jambi/pages/Home
Okay, that is good enough to start from. > I now have a stable compile setup on > > 2.6.24-24 32bit Linux kernel using gcc 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 8.04 server) and > Windows XP 32bit using MSVC 2005. > > I would like to share some binary builds with the people wanting to > play with Jambi without having to go through the build steps, but I > don't have any good place to upload them. Also, I'm struggeling a bit > with generating a full set of javadoc, which would be nice to put > into the package. I will try other builds if people have them, for testing purposes, etc. Mainly on Linux(Mandriva), but can get to Mac and Windows also. > What about creating a plain Google Code project for Qt Jambi to at > least share these? So far, our best shot was codehaus, but they seem > to ignore my pleas for shelter :-/ There are of course other alternatives > like sourceforge and java.net, but google code seems to be the > easiest to use and most the most popular these days. Guess the bug tracker > isn't much to talk about compared to Jira, but it could be a nice > start until some better alternative comes along... What do you > think? Not sure why you believe google code seems to be the easiest. SourceForge has upgraded its offerings to provide use of well-known open source applications in a hosted mode for bug tracking, forums, etc. It also seems to have the most options for the usual project needs of anything I know of. Plus, no waiting time for project setup anymore. Just register a project and start going. Regards, Raymond _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
