> Hello, great to hear from you again! > > Dusan Zatkovsky wrote: > > Before I tell you about my work, read this: > > > > As a new developer, I am missing many basic informations, such as: > > > > - where is up-to-date main page of qtjambi? ( there are many old > > informations on gitorious ) > > > > ... and questions follows up: > > > > - what is current repository? > > > > - how to contribute? > > "Contributing to Qt Jambi" on wiki seems to be a little bit > > obsolete ( > > for example "Qt Jambi is currently under maintenance by Nokia Qt > > Development Frameworks", ...) > > > > - where is official tracker? > > We can't exist without it. There must exist list of tasks to be > > done to > > prevent duplicated work. > > > > I think we must consolidate this, because now sources are on gitorious, > > _obsolete_ wiki is on gitorious, bugtracker is on sf.net, what else? > > > > Start talking about this problem, because without this we can't > > cooperate. > > > > If we need to migrate to ONE complex site ( sources, web, wiki, tracker > > ), just do that! There are many of them ( sf, google, tigris ) > > See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/\ > > Comparison_of_open_source_software_hosting_facilities > > Yes, since Nokia and the authors of Qt Jambi seems to have withdrawn > from the > project, at least from speaking officially on the list, I cannot see any > reason why > the project should continue to live under their "wings". > > Although I like the gitorious interface a lot, there seems to be support > for git on > sourceforge as well. So I guess moving the repo over to SF should be the > correct > thing to do for tidyness. Do anyone have any experience with git on > sourceforge? > How does it work? > > Also, wiki info on the project found on gitorious should be updated and > moved > over to SF. I think Rene is working on setting up a proper web page for > us on > SF, correct? When you have a workbench up for us, some more can start > putting > things in there. > > > Now back to my work: > > > > I have made some simpler "release" scripts, which will create .tar.gz > > with qtjambi distribution ( contains jars, designer, juic, linguist ) to > > learn how thinks works ( designer was a tricky job, thanks Eskil for help > > ), but currently I have no time to maintain it. > > If no-one else is willing to put up a release on Linux, I will do it, no > problem. Actually, I'm working in compiling qt jambi in kubuntu 9.04. After I obtain a sucessfull build I can start working extending some class of qt jambi or porting some classes.
Also I have a question. what wiki we will use, mediawiki or the trac wiki ? While I'm waiting the compilation of qt I can port the wiki pages of gitorious to the new wiki. > Can you commit your work on the designer, and maybe the release building > script on the gitorious? If not, send it to me on my mail. > > > - is it possible to split qtjambi to smaller jars ( core, gui, ... ) like > > in c++? > > I guess this is a discussion for the long run. > > > - original 4.5 sources are "chaotic", it need some rearrangement. > > It is hard to identify sources, generated sources and targets, > > everything builds together in the same directories ( aaaargh ). > > Maybe this have been done by Francis currently, I don't know... (?) > > Francis was working hard on "tidying things up", hope he will join in > again soon. > > Helge > _______________________________________________ > Qt-jambi-interest mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest > _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
