2011/11/18 João Abecasis <joao.abeca...@nokia.com>: > The reason for trying to keep some distance from QSettings is exactly that it > has flaws and issues. I don't want to be *forced* to use it or re-implement > it. Ideally, the backend will be handled by a platform-specific plugin that > is *not* QSettings or based on it.
QSettings could be extended to support json too though. > > (Also note that there is a wish to remove QSettings from Qt Core in Qt 5, > pending availability of something to replace it with.) Why? We wouldn't lose the ability to read and write the same data stores that QSettings does? I think the registry is not considered obsolete yet on Windows, as ugly as it is? _______________________________________________ Qt-qml mailing list Qt-qml@qt.nokia.com http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-qml
