Hi Jason,
Maybe better to start a new thread for feature-specific feedback, our developers probably don't look too much into what's happening in this one... but thanks anyway, I'll also forward to the team. Cheers, Volker "Jason H" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > So I am looking at this QWebElement/Frame and for my uses, it comes up a > bit short. > > I want an enhanced QDomDocument that can take a XPath query as a parameter > to findAll() (Which doesn't exist in QDomDocument) And also, the results > of QDomNodeList should be convertible to QList<QDomNode> for iteration. > The reason why you use QDomNodeList isn't clear, it makes working with > QDomNodes a pain, I convert everything to QList<QDomNode> anyway, and my > only use of QDomNodeList is to make it a QList<QDomNode>! > > Then QWebElement has QList<QWebElement> findAll() but no way to make a > QWebElement from a list of QWebElements! This would allow you to select a > set of elements, then sub-select additional elements. You'd currently have > to: > QList<QWebElement> subselectedWEs; > foreach (QWebElement we, selectedWEs) > { > subSelectedWEs << we.findAll(subselection); > } > > It would be better to > > QList<QWebElement> subselectedWEs = > root.findAll(selection).findAll(subselection); > or > QList<QWebElement> selected = root.findAll(selection) > QList<QWebElement> subselectedWEs = selected.findAll(subselection); > > Another question is does this assume a GUI is needed for QWeb*? I can't > have a GUI. I can't interact with a desktop! Why does QWebElement > recreate so much functionality of QDomDocument, without inheriting from > it? Can't we push these features into QDomDocument? (Which doesn't need a > GUI!) > > I do all of this so I can make a SOAP service. And there are more SOAP > services scheduled, so this is a big deal for me. I've currently cobbled > together a crude XPath parser. > > Ideally what I really need is a QObject which works through QMeta* to > provide a local object that allows me to interact with the SOAP service as > if it were just another QObject (signals/slots, service discovery). I > noticed that QtSoap was recently updated, but it stays stuck at version > 1.1. I need 2.0. Minimally, 1.2. > > Any information is appreciated! > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Jason H <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:31:03 AM > Subject: Re: [Qt4-preview-feedback] Invitation to join the Qt 4.6 Beta > Program > > FYI: Missing category for type of app. I use Qt for server-side services, > i.e. HTTP-SOAP and the like. > > While this is not a focus of Qt, the Qt library makes writing these apps > easier. Even though there is no real SOAP support (your soap client add-in > is not soap 2.0 compliant) Qt could really use a AJAX or JSON > client/server. The recent Qt in the Cloud labs article shows that Qt needs > to be able Web-2.0 enabled. > > I do like that "DOM access API" was added. But I need to know where to > find those docs! (Specifically what is added for 4.6) > > Thanks! > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Volker Hilsheimer <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:47:07 AM > Subject: [Qt4-preview-feedback] Invitation to join the Qt 4.6 Beta Program > > > Hi! > > > We are preparing the release of the Qt 4.6 Beta, and during the Beta phase > of Qt 4.6 we would like to ask the community of Qt users for feedback > regarding the stability, performance and overall quality of our designs, > APIs and implementations. > > In addition to asking for feedback through the regular channels we would > like to make sure that as many Qt users as possible have performed a few > specific tasks during the Beta phase to help us understand the most > important issues that we need to address before the launch of Qt 4.6 later > this year. We would like to invite you to sign up to the Qt 4.6 Beta > Program by completing this very short sign-up form - it should only take a > few minutes: > > http://survey.confirmit.com/wix1/p995540662.aspx > > If you sign up to the Qt 4.6 Beta Program, then we will during the next > month ask you to complete two surveys that ask for your impression of the > quality of Qt 4.6. Those surveys will not take very long to complete, but > you should of course be able to set some time aside to test the Qt 4.6 > Beta release. This release is expected to become available within the > first weeks of October, and will be announced on the usual mailinglists. > > It is of course not necessary to sign up to the Beta program in order to > get access to the Qt 4.6 Beta packages, and our regular feedback channel > will continue to be open for everybody: > > http://lists.trolltech.com/qt4-preview-feedback/ > > However, through the Beta Program we hope to understand better how much Qt > 4.6 has been tried and tested. > > We hope you will enjoy experimenting with the Qt 4.6 pre-releases and are > looking forward to your feedback! > > http://qt.nokia.com/doc/4.6-snapshot/qt4-6-intro.html > > > On behalf of the Qt Team, > Volker Hilsheimer > > -- > Qt Developer Days 2009 | Last Chance to Register! > Munich, Germany: October 12th - 14th > San Francisco, California: November 2nd - 4th > Register now! http://qt.nokia.com/qtdevdays2009 > > > _______________________________________________ > Qt4-preview-feedback mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt4-preview-feedback > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qt4-preview-feedback mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt4-preview-feedback > > > > _______________________________________________ Qt4-preview-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt4-preview-feedback
