Op 17-5-2011 23:24, Jason H schreef: > Can you clarify what love you would like QtSQL to get? * Support for DDL * Easier to use and way better documented way of creating db-independent queries (QSqlDriver::sqlStatement is the key, but it is not documented properly, nor is it recommended to use QSqlDriver in end-user code) * Support for more types of query parts (limit vs. top, sort, grouping) * QSql*model classes need to be asynchronous * Actually apply the fixes that are available already as merge requests or attached to bug reports * Fix some of the other issues, like that table names are not escaped properly * A way to represent database settings in a database independent way
Most of the above, I managed to build myself on top of the existing QtSql code, but it could have been so much easier to get my application to work properly independent of the database type... But, I could imagine that QtSql could become part of a broader Qt data framework. Relational database are, after all, only one way to store and manage data. It would be very nice if there would be framework that would allow easy interaction with these different types of backends with a single interface. André _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
