On 9/23/11 4:10 PM, "ext Tomasz Siekierda" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi, >again, long time no see, but I'm coming back with more or less good >news, and some questions. > >I've filled merge request (#51) for QWebService (converter is >temporarily waiting), and got some feedback from Thiago. He did >propose to move my sources from QtNetwork into an add-on. I find this >idea very good, but wish to enquiry here. What is your view on that? >(if anyone happens to have any, that is). Same view as Thiago from my side. Having it as an addon is IMO the best solution here. It gives you some more freedom in terms of developing and maintaining the code and I personally also don't want to add this directly to QtNetwork. Cheers, Lars > >In other news, sources got updated to v0.5.0, with many improvements - >most behind the scenes, but there are also some API updates. Repos can >be found at: > - (main repo, separate from Qt) https://gitorious.org/qwebservice > - (merge request) https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase/merge_requests/51 > - (QWebService@Qt) >https://gitorious.org/~sierdzio/qt/sierdzio-qtbase-qwebservice > - (WSDL converter@Qt) >https://gitorious.org/~sierdzio/qt/sierdzio-qttools-qwebservice > >Just as usual, any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Regardless >of whether QWebService will make it into Qt5 or not, the package is >currently fully usable and can be used as a separate product. Enjoy, >if you wish to :) Here's a small teaser of the QtDevNet example: >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00tZ04XPj98 >Cheers, >sierdzio >_______________________________________________ >Qt5-feedback mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
