Sorry for the delay, I was busy the whole week. OK, so I'll move my code into and add-on. I've looked through a ton of documents, mostly QtDN wikis and Qt documentation, a few new questions have emerged.
1) I cannot find a definite answer on what is actually considered to be an add-on. For example, the newly separated widgets is said to be an add-on, and resides in qt5/qtbase/src/widgets. QtXmlPatterns is also considered an add-on, but occupies a full separate repo at qt5/qtxmlpatterns. Where should I put my code, then? Into Qt5 main repository, or into qtbase? I would kind of opt for the former, as it would help me keep sources, examples and tests in one place (for example qt5/qwebservice). 2) What about tests and examples? Tests for various add-ons that reside inside qtbase seem to be placed there in a more or less random fashion, with some having their own subfolders, while others happily share directory structure with the rest of the suite (that is, with tests of Qt Essentials). 3) Can I include the WSDL converter application in my add-on, or does it have to stay separate? 4) Should I delete my current merge request now? Cheers, sierdzio On 23 September 2011 22:15, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>I've filled merge request (#51) for QWebService (converter is >>temporarily waiting), and got some feedback from Thiago. He did >>propose to move my sources from QtNetwork into an add-on. I find this >>idea very good, but wish to enquiry here. What is your view on that? >>(if anyone happens to have any, that is). > > Same view as Thiago from my side. Having it as an addon is IMO the best > solution here. It gives you some more freedom in terms of developing and > maintaining the code and I personally also don't want to add this directly > to QtNetwork. > > Cheers, > Lars _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
