On Tuesday, September 27, 2011, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, 27 de September de 2011 06:20:17 Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: >> > JSON support is provided by many different implementations already. I >> > don't >> > think we can choose one right now. So we should simply list all the >> > available ones and apply the Darwin principle: standardise on the one >> > that survives. >> Here's one I wrote based on QLALR and it's way faster than the (very >> popular) qjson (benchmarks are in the repo): >> http://gitorious.org/qjsonparser/qjsonparser. >> >> Does V8 have it's own json parser that we can use? > > That's why I said we have 5 different JSON parsers today and Darwin should > determine which one we'll pick. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint: > E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358 >
About V8, Qt is gonna use that right? I'm guessing V8 has it's own uber fast json parser so why not make a qt layer for that..? Seems like that gives no duplication and json in c++, everyone happy :) What is gonna happen with the global shortcut thing i mentioned earlier? Is someone gonna make a qt implementation for that or adjust the libqxt classes so they can be used..? Or something else?
_______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
