On Monday, 3 de October de 2011 16:25:45 Lorn Potter wrote: > Hi, > > Currently, there are 3 instances of QMetaObjectBuilder, in QtDeclarative, > QtSystems (serviceframework) and QtSystems (publish and subscribe). There > are only trivial changes between these existing versions of > QMetaObjectBuilder private class.
Don't forget QDBusMetaObjectWriter and the original meta object creator in
ActiveQt.
> Any objections if I add a QMetaObjectBuilder to qtbase in qtcorelib, so to
> remove code duplication, (and I can use it as well)?
> I will use the code from QtDeclarative module.
>
> The respective owners of those modules/code should then probably remove
> their versions and convert their code to using the one in QtBase.
>
> comments?
Good idea.
I just hope that a generic solution with the new code isn't performing much
worse than the specific solutions the older codebases had.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
