>-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On >Behalf Of Knoll Lars (Nokia-MP-Qt/Oslo)
>>The reason why i don't like those is that it is really exposing a lot of >>the >>internals, and that using them is complicated. >>A better alternative would be to have public API to do the things that we >>want. That is, something like >>QObject::addDynamicSignal(...) QObject::addDynamicSlot() ... (and a >>dynamicslotevent), or whatever that api is used for. >> >>Now, if these classes stay private anyway, i don't object. (because >>reducing >>code duplication is a good thing) > >I would also prefer to keep it private to start with :) > >But yes, let's reduce the code duplication and rather have one well tested >version. I believe Lorn just forgot to mention this tiny little detail.... Yes, it's only going to be a private export. -- Alex _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
