On 08/10/2011 09:08, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> Qt Quick can be default, for all I care, but right now having QT +=
> declarative in .pro file seems a bit strange to me. It's like QT +=
> imperative. I am specifically referring to what we do in the .pro
> files and the name of the libraries (the source can still reside in
> qtdeclarative/, I don't care). If Quick is the name of the technology,
> why not just use that?
+1 from me.
Even if QML becomes the default like core and gui are default in Qt4,
one would have to do
QT -= declarative
to turn it off.
This is the only place where "declarative" refers to QML / Qt Quick.
Well, apart from the library names of course.
Like Girish said, "Quick" or "QML" is the name of the technology.
"Declarative" was just a working title when it didn't have a name yet.
After all .ui and .qrc files are purely declarative other than QML. ;)
> My suggestion to rename Gui was more practical.
[...]
Another way would be to provide a (very simple) qt4support module that
maps the old headers to the new names.
Then you must have a Qt4/Qt5 section in your .pro file though to use
that module.
BR,
Jörg
_______________________________________________
Qt5-feedback mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
