On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Kent Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Girish, > > Den 08. okt. 2011 08:17, skrev ext Girish Ramakrishnan: >> Hi, >> Is there a plan to rename declarative module to quick? I would prefer >> saying "QT += quick" or "QT += quick2" instead of "QT += declarative". >> Isn't declarative more like a programming style? > > The idea is to move the graphical parts of declarative (e.g. scenegraph > items) into a "quick" or "quick2" library, and keep the "core" > declarative stuff in the existing library. Coincidentially, this makes > the .pro file's "QT += qtquick" correspond to the "import QtQuick" that > you do in qml. It also means you'll need to add both in your .pro file > (e.g. "QT += declarative qtquick"), unless we automagically add > declarative when qtquick is added (not a fan of that). >
I really like the idea of separating the graphical parts to separate library. Still, please do consider renaming 'declarative' in QT += declarative to something else. QT += qml or quickcore or something? We should take the whole "Quick" terminology to heart and use it all over :-) Girish _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
