On Thursday 13. October 2011 13.37.52 ext Simon Hausmann wrote: > On Thursday, October 13, 2011 01:24:55 PM ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Thursday, 13 de October de 2011 12:22:39 Simon Hausmann wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > There are plenty of source incompatible changes going into the Qt 5 > > > modules. This can make development of depending modules difficult. > > > > > > I recall that the KDE 4 development cycle had similar issues, and I > > > have vague memories of this being mitigated with a simple procedure: > > > Source incompatible changes were pushed only once a week (on > > > Mondays?). > > > > > > Would it make sense to do the same for Qt 5 development? > > > > +1 on Binary Incompatible Mondays. This is especially important for > > changes in the tool classes, which affect just about everything. > > > > However, that assumes that your BIC change passes through Gerrit and CI > > on time. > > Right. So staging on Monday will uuuusually also result in them being > integrated on Monday. The turnarounds aren't too bad right now. But yeah, > if the window is missed, then it sucks having to wait another week. > > > Simon > _______________________________________________ > Qt5-feedback mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
Hi, Do we really have so many source incompatible changes? For Qt5 source compatiblity suposed to be kept as much as it make sense. So if you hit this kind of changes daily then something goes really wrong. Cheers, Jędrek
_______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
