Right, thanks. If the field were blank to begin with, which is what 'Human with Unknown Racks' would seem to imply, there wouldn't be any need to click, double-click, triple-click, click & drag, backspace, or do anything other than simply type in my rack. That's the kind of "ease of use" I'm requesting for post-mortem.
John Hart --- In [email protected], "Jim Caughran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Andy <andy@> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, John Hart wrote: > > > Incidentally, there's a bug here that would be > > > automatically fixed by implementing 'Human with > > > Unknown Racks' as described above. The behavior is > > > this: In the example above where 'ABGHMY?' is on my > > > rack, I double-click in that text field, attempting > > > to select all that text so that I can type in my > > > actual rack. What happens is 'ABGHMY' is selected, > > > but the '?' is not, and the result is that I end > > > up with the 7 letters I actually had, PLUS a blank > > > that I didn't have, on my rack. Come to think of it, > > > that's another bug: Quackle lets me have 8 letters! > > > > > > (version 0.94 on Windows 2000, if that helps) > > > > Try triple-clicking instead of double-clicking. > > Works in Windows XP. No idea if it will work on Windows 2000. > > Shift+<end>, and type your rack in. >
