Maybe I'm not using Quackle properly to analyze endgames, I'll say that to start.
Consider this position: Scott 417, Seth 404 Seth to play with ADEEIOO Scott's rack: IPQTRU A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O ------------------------------ 1|H O B ' P ' J =| 2| R E C L I N E D " I - | 3|W A G ' N O K A | 4|' - ' L H O '| 5| C O A E V A L F E | 6| " W A X A " E T " | 7| ' V R I ' | 8|a F R U I T S G ' =| 9|N ' U M ' N ' | 10|E " B " S E I Z E D " | 11|R O D O | 12|G - U ' T '| 13|I - T ' ' Y - | 14|A M N E S I A " - | 15|S ' s T E R N L Y =| ------------------------------ Seth's play was AUDIO 12d, which neatly blocks the Q-action in the lower left quadrant. AUDIO wasn't one of the options that came out of "generate choices" but when I did a "50 choices" pullup and then simmed to "many" it was listed as a 100% winning play, along with IOTA 13c. And yet when I jump over to my rack and plug in JUT 1M as a response to AUDIO, that's listed as a 100% winning play, too. What am I doing wrong here? Or to attack a different way, how should I be using Quackle to look at pre-endgames and endgames? - scott pianowski
