Anyone care to explain these results?
Stewart: Turn 10
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O -> Stewart ABEMTWY
411
------------------------------ BMSC Opponent unknown
255
1|= ' L I ' =|
2| - " O O J E S S e | best F3 TEAM 33 100.0% BWY
3| - A T ' E A | 12.3 F3 BEAT 25 100.0% MWY
4|' - T A R X U '| 18.2 F2 WE 30 100.0% ABMTY
5| - H E - T | 18.5 5I W(E)Y 18 100.0% ABEMT
6| " " I V O " W| 18.6 L11 WYTE(D) 24 100.0% ABM
7| ' N ' E I A| 18.7 F6 MA(N)TE(L) 28 100.0% BWY
8|= F U N G O R ' R U G| 19.9 F6 BE(N)T 24 100.0% AMWY
9| Q I ' S P i N N E R | 21.1 F6 ME(N)T 24 100.0% ABWY
10| " R " E E D| 21.2 13I BATME(N) 26 100.0% WY
11| M I L T Z - D I| 22.1 F2 BE 24 100.0% AMTWY
12|' E O O - I F| 27.6*F3 BEAM 37 99.24% TWY
13| P R I V Y ' - N |
--Tracking-----------------------------------
14| - " " E | CANHUIGTELOOAAABCDL 19
15|= ' = D E S K|
------------------------------
I can't see any way that BEAM is 27pts worse than BEAT or TEAM, or that
it only wins 99.24% of the time.
If the Championship Analysis figures are this unreliable why should
anyone use them? They seem to produce nonsense results a lot of the time
with no way of finding out why. I'm fully supportive of the Quackle
project but I'm rapidly losing faith in the auto-generated reports to
produce figures worth looking at.
Stewart
