On 9/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No perfect way of doing this. There are several sources of words in the > average person's vocabulary. > > But most of us have a scrabble vocabulary that far outstrips the normal > person's. Do you > want to give up RETINAE or NEROLIS or QI or ZA, just because they are not in > most > folks vocabs or spellcheckers?
*You* wouldn't need to give it up - what is being proposed is to separate the move-generation lexicon from the adjudication lexicon. Thus, NEROLIS, QI and ZA could remain in the word judge, but only be added to the move generation lexicon after, say, the human player had played it thrice. Ideally you'd want the move generation lexicon to be per-player. martin
