I've never tried compiling Quackle on a 64-bit machine :-/ Sorry! Thanks for trying :) --Jason
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 20:23, G. Vincent Castellano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've made a couple of feeble attempts to compile Quackle 0.95 on Ubuntu > 8/AMD > 64, and I'll be the first to point out the challenges may be of my own > making. > > I promise I will try with 0.96 before bothering anyone with further > questions. > Note I'm not interested in building under a 32-bit environment because I'm > trying to make a clean break with the past. If it came to that I would just > run > it in a 32-bit guest VM. > > In order that I can properly size this task, could the maintainers let me > know > which of the following statements they believe most likely applies to > building a > Quackle in the stated environment: > > A) It is know to work fine if you just follow the instructions as written > and > don't get fancy. > B) Can be made to work, but certain known pre-conditions apply above and > beyond > those for building on 32-bit x86 Linux. > C) You'll have to give it a go and let us know. > D) There are known problems which will probably yield to the appropriate > level > of effort. > E) Don't even bother, we know it's gnarly and we'll get back to you. > > Thanks guys! > --gvc > >
