zax_cgp, There's no need to be so rude. Oh, and signing the message with your name would be polite too.
On 8 May 2010 13:45, <[email protected]> wrote: Are you being a little overANALytical? There is bound to be error in an > solution set. Go outside and chase the squirrels or something. > > Quackle is not god. > > --- On *Sat, 5/8/10, David B.Lewis <[email protected]>* wrote: > > > From: David B.Lewis <[email protected]> > Subject: [quackle] seeing possible future moves > To: [email protected] > Date: Saturday, May 8, 2010, 5:51 AM > > > Toward the end of a game, I thought I had made a play that shut down the > last bingo lane and assured a win. When I load the position into Quackle and > ask Championship Player about the situation, it suggests a few different > moves with a 100% win but not the move that I chose. When I specifically > enter that move and then simulate, the moves that Quackle had suggested show > up as winning 100% of the time, and the move that I chose shows up as > winning 99.96% of the time. > > For the life of me, I can't figure out what could happen in that 0.04% of > the situations. There was only 1 tile in the bag at the time, so I've tried > all of my opponent's possible racks, and nothing turns up that is a win. > > Is there any way to get at the information that Quackle uses during a > simulation, so that I could either determine that a mistake was made on > Quackle's part (and that my move was a sure thing) or find out just what > terrific move my opponent may have had? > > Thx in advance. > > PS: ideally, I'd like Quackle to say "Great move, but you missed the remote > possibility of your opponent's disconnected thirteen here". On a related > note, in a previous post, I thought it would also be useful to show where > moves played, so that I could see, for example, that 75% of my opponent's > responses to my move use a hook that I had opened up or a hot-spot that I > had created or a spot I didn't block. > > >
