|
"Indeed, but using these visual tactics for political gain is
sickening. As is using/showing Dana Reeves position. Democrats are
good at that.
No political entity was involved
with the making of 9/11. It was is Michael Moores doing.
I hardly think any democrat, nor
independent, or republican for that matter would ever "allow" any such thing as
attacks on the U.S. Did Bush "allow" the attack of 9/11?
The key is going to war
for the right reasons, as well as using our tax dollars
effectively.
We are in Iraq, now for the wrong
reasons, while N.Korea indeed has nuclear weapons.
Pres. Bush hasn't, nor will he
'protect' us. No moreso than any sitting President
would.
As for using Reeve ..Have you
looked at any fact finding site ?
Not one that has bias slant,
but pure basic fact finding?
The Republican 'inaccuracies as
vote garnering is to me nauseating.
But far too many people see or
listen to rhetoric, and do not bother to check facts or learn the true workings
of our government.
I'm a republican, and woefully
ashamed because of this administration.
The cost of lives will increase?
Cost of living (finances?) Bush has sent us into a greater deficit than
ever before...and I'm old enough to remember and know the horrors that brought
in years past.
Bush did that, and at the same
time wanting 3 trillion additional dollars to go to Mars.
You said you had already cast
your ballot...
So this is
moot.
"
{{The best to you,}} Sherry
' To be willing to March into Hell for a Heavenly cause"
|
- Re: [QUAD-L] voting Sherry
- Re: [QUAD-L] voting River Wolfe
- Re: [QUAD-L] voting River Wolfe
