I was referring to those who "claimed" that they were to keep track of 
every paper.
Their fear of Sadamned should have kept them on the job. 
Then there is that pesky report that the first troops found no tags on 
said bunkers and no sign of said explosives.
It doesn't strike you as odd that the SAME people who claim Sadamned 
couldn't hide 10LBs of WMD's now CLAIM 380 TONS just disappeared under 
our noses.
The last time the UN Inspectors SAW the said explosives was in Jan 03, 
all they SAW in Mar 03 were seals that Sadamned could have duplicated.
The scientist now speaking up "mysteriously" just 1 week prior to our 
election may be holding a grudge or coerced.

On a lighter note:
"With the same energy...I put into going after the Viet Cong and trying 
to win for our country, I pledge to you I will hunt down and capture or 
kill the terrorists before they harm us. And we will wage a war on 
terror that makes America proud and brings the world to our side." --
John 'the 3 bandaid' Kerry, promising to lose the war on terror 
 
> I'm with you on that the UN was definitely part of the problem but 
the O.F.F
>  scandal was suspected long before we went in.
> 
> They were probably not there for fear of being blown to kingdom come 
and
> this should've been a key target in the"Shock & Awe" campaign.
> This was our war these people didn't want any part of it so it's no 
surprise
> they were'nt there greeting us it was this administrations job to 
secure
> these weapons not theirs it's that simple.
> 
> The timing is funny, why wasn't this addressed when it happened?
> You think they were trying to keep it quiet maybe?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Mark
> 
>  
> -------Original Message-------
>  
> From: Stuntman
> Date: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 15:34:47
> To: QuadPirate; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stuntman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [QUAD-L] Who's the Enemy?
>  
> I dunno, why have we uncovered so much evidence to support that they 
> might have been part of the problem?
> The UN is up to its eyeballs in the O.F.F scandle, the timing of all 
> this is just too simple.
> If these guy's were keeping a watch on the place WHY were they not 
> there to great our troops?
> "
> > "I was serving as a staff member during the time in question. The 
> > Commander on the site had complete real time intelligence on what 
to 
> > expect and possibly find at the Al-QaQaa depot. The ordinance in 
> > question was not found when teams were sent in to inspect and 
secure 
> > the area. When this information was relayed, Operational plans were 
> > adjusted and the unit moved forward. Had the ordinance in question 
> > been discovered, a security team would have been left in place."
> 
> -- 
> It's not the fall that hurts.
> Home page http://tnthompson0.tripod.com/homeincyberspace/
> Graphics portfolio http://tnthompson1.tripod.com/index.htm
> Domain space http://nw-in.com/index.html
> 
> 
> . 
> 

-- 
It's not the fall that hurts.
Home page http://tnthompson0.tripod.com/homeincyberspace/
Graphics portfolio http://tnthompson1.tripod.com/index.htm
Domain space http://nw-in.com/index.html


Reply via email to