Is terrorism going to stop when we get Bin Laden. No. So why should it be a top priority? Killing Abu Musab al-Zarqawi should be our top priority.
Jim
At 12:45 PM 11/4/2004, QuadPirate wrote:
I believe Saddam wasn't actually carrying out attacks either he was their leader just like Bin Laden only Bin Laden planned TWC.____________________________________________________
I can't believe I'm reading this.
Tell that to the people of NY I bet they have a very different opinion.
Are you saying he's not our top priority in terrorism?
That's like saying our President is just a figure head!
When we get Bin Laden this country will have a party like no other and for that time we'll be one America and then Bush will have done his Job.
It's crazy to think this country can take our time to get Bin Laden.
Mark
-------Original Message-------
From: Jim Lubin
Date: Thursday, November 04, 2004 14:14:21
To: QuadPirate; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stuntman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the President?
He's just a figure head. He is not personally carrying out any attacks. When we catch Bin Laden all terrorism is not going to end. That's why I say we'll catch him when we catch him. Efforts should be focused on the people actually plaining to carry out attacks and the support networks behind them.
At 11:48 AM 11/4/2004, QuadPirate wrote:
You know Jim Bin Laden took 8 years before he attacked the WTC again so every day he's still out there is a threat to us.
So there's no time to say we'll get him when we get him we need to get him before he strikes again.
The thought that we have plenty of time is like a time bomb waiting to explode.
We need him now not later!
How can anyone argue with that?
Mark
IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved -
Click
Here Jim Lubin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bothell, WA, USA
http://makoa.org/jim
disAbility Resources: http://www.makoa.org
Transverse Myelitis Association: http://www.myelitis.org/HowToHelp
