I see you're a bit uninformed...
Check out these FACTS:
votersunite.org
blackboxvoting.org
http://www.commondreams.org/
dailykos.com
eop.blogspot.com
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6210240
http://www.alternet.org/
www.progressreport.org
http://www.democracyforamerica.com/
http://www.geocities.com/~oberoi/newspapr.html
Sometimes there where more votes than voters (Keith's blog: Cuyahoga County,
Ohio. In 29 precincts there, the County's website shows, we had the most
unexpected results in years: more votes than voters.)
Sometimes the votes skewed wildly against the known party affiliation.
(Keith's blog: 29 of those Florida counties had large Democratic majorities
among registered voters but produced landslides for President Bush. )
Sometimes the machines simply screwed up -- the instances where these
problems were caught and fixed are how we know this.
The Los Angeles Times today mentioned some of the problems, and alluded to
the growing blogosphere that will not let this story go.
If you want to know the facts behind all this, and why Keith vigorously
pursues it, read his blog, and watch Countdown all this week.
As for that L.A. Times piece, here's a chunk.
"David Dill, a Stanford University computer expert, said that based on
reports that Dill's organization - Verified Voting.org - has received, one
precinct in Youngstown, Ohio, recorded a negative 25 million votes, which
was discarded from official results. And it was widely reported after Nov. 2
that a North Carolina precinct lost 4,000 votes when a recording device used
up all its memory but voters continued to cast ballots on the machine."
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/2004/la-na-ohio9nov09,1,6497338.story?c
oll=la-news-elect2004
Keith blogs:
"Representative John Conyers of Michigan...� now leads a small but growing
group of Democratic congressmen who've written the General Accountability
Office demanding an investigation of what we should gently call the
Electronic Voting Angst. Conyers insisted he wasn't trying to re-cast the
election, but seemed mystified that in the 21st Century we could have
advanced to a technological state in which voting- fine, flawed, or
felonious- should leave no paper trail. ... By actual rough count, between
the 8 p.m. ET start of the program and 10:30 p.m. ET last night, we received
1,570 e-mails (none of them duplicates or forms, as near as I can tell).
1,508 were positive, 62 negative."� Read the whole blog...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6210240/
