The tragedy is that "if" someone would have placed food and water in front of her and "if" she could have been able to reach it, she would have survived.
That was the legal ruling! How many on the quad list can't "if" their food is placed in front of them would be unable to feed themselves? Are we then to legally eliminate them, just because they can't feed themselves? One fact, Terri could swallow, she could eat normally, it just took too long so a feeding tube was inserted. We are on a slippery slope! G.A.
