Lets be a bit careful here. We all have different beliefs. Roe v Wade
didn't create a law, it struck down laws that are unconstitutional. I don't
feel that the gov't has the right to tell me and whatever doctor I choose what
I can or can not do. I always find it strangely perverse that men seem to want
to control women and what they do. Almost every religion grants men authority
over women as if it was a birthright. Because every religion sees it as a
birthright.
Nobody wants to adopt American children(thank you Oprah and Sally Jessy)
Most Asylums and Orphanages have been closed in the past 40 years because of
the "stigma" they caused. Now unwanted children are sent to foster homes that
have loose oversight and are almost always under funded. Where is that church
money? Why isn't it morally important that unwanted children are taken care
of.
We are a nation of laws as long as the laws are agreeable with us today.
Tomorrow, who knows? I find it incredibly hypocritical that people would
picket and denounce abortion when they have yet to adopt an American child and
picket the fertility clinic. To top that off, they are all extreme
conservatives that feel they pay too much in taxes. How do we begin funding an
extra 1.5 million unwanted children each year? (By the way, that is 5800
abortions each day and that doesn't include holidays when the clinics aren't
open)
Some serious problems that won't get better with name calling and really
has nothing to do with cloning cells or using human eggs or embryos to cure
many of the health problems of people who have been given the gift of
life, if not the quality.
If you don't believe that we are here as a result of evolution
from lower life forms, then how can you have a faith that says that some
cells, visible only under a high powered microscope, constitute a human
life?
john
In a message dated 5/27/2005 7:43:21 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Funny,
When a person stands by the morals they believe in, are
they the closed
minded one?
I guess SOME people haven't been paying
attention on how easily the
activist judges pervert well meaning
legistlation.
Roe VS Wade: Intent; to make it "LEGAL" for a woman to get
an abortion
during the "FIRST" Trimester.
Activist Judges have:
1)
turned a "LAW" into a "RIGHT" illegaly w/o an Amendment
2) extended that
"Illegal Right" to minors w/o parental consent
3) now fighting for
"partial birth" abortions
4) forced TAXPAYERS to bare the financial
burden for approx 1.5 MILLION
Abortions each year
Child Abuse:
has been perverted into parental control by the CPS
Can you imagine
how far they could pervert cloning?
Yes, I agree in stem cell
research.
No, I'm against human cloning.
But the wording of ANY law
regarding it must have no loopholes for
activist judges.
>
> At 09:39 AM 5/27/2005, QuadPirate wrote:
> >And in America
Bush's religeous beliefs are supposed to be in no way
> >involved
in his decisions as our president, he's supposed to be
listening
> >to the people not the voices in his head.
>
> I
don't know how you figure that. Everyone makes decisions based on
their
> own religious or non-religious beliefs.
>
> So Mark,
do you think that any person who has religious beliefs is
just
>
listening to voices in their head or just people who don't agree with
you
> and your beliefs?
>
> Jim
