Hi Bill,
This is the key issue, to me, in the whole embryonic stem cell debate. Some people say that an embryonic stem cell might be used too help bring about medical cures for mankind, and other people say that using a stem cell from an embryo is degrading human life and can't be used for medical research. Then most of these embryos are disposed of down the drain, while continuing to make more embryos at fertility clinics every day.
I just can't get my mind around that reasoning.
With Love,
CtrlAltDel aka Dave
C4/5 Complete - 30 Years Post
Bill_J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wheel can certainly speak for himself/herself. I think there are people who (20 years from now) might come down with ALS or Parkinson's that would disagree. The bill would not kill recent embryos for stem cell research. It was proposing they use the embryos destined to be destroyed anyway to be used.Bill age 55
C6 Incomplete since 7/20/68
Leesburg, FL
For every action, there is an equal and opposite government program.----- Original Message -----From: Jim LubinTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [email protected] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:40 PMSubject: Re: [QUAD-L] Stem Cell Bill KilledCare to explain that? Death is certain for everyone. Stem cells from human embryos may have the potential to make life better for some but they won't make anyone immortal.
Seems to me if he had signed it then it would have meant he had chosen certain death for those embryos funded by the government.
At 05:04 PM 7/19/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bush has once again demonstrated bad judgement. He has chosen certain death for some Americans to have money saved for the destruction of another government.
