Jim,,
I have brain damage and I still can't figure out what your arguement is? You just keep saying everyone is wrong. No IV clinics now? Keep embryos frozen? How many chickens do eat for breakfast? I use to call 'm eggs. Can't tell when a rooster gets loose, huh?
 
john
 
 
In a message dated 7/20/2006 7:11:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think both are wrong.
I don't think they should have created them in the first place for IVF, but since they exist then keep them on life support (i.e. frozen) indefinitely. They are not something that should be killed (i.e. by removing stem cells) to possibly make another persons life better. I have a moral problem with taking one life to improve another persons life.

Embryos left over from IVF are not the only source for stem cells. (2006.06.27: Research on Alternative Sources of Pluripotent Stem Cells,
http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t060627.html )
So I feel those sources should pursued since there would be no moral or ethical concerns. I'm all for scientific advancement that does not conflict with my morals and ethics.

At 12:47 PM 7/20/2006, RollinOn wrote:
Let me get this straight, if you throw the embryos in the trash they're called left over waste.
If you research them, your killing human beings.

----
Jim Lubin              
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://makoa.org/jim
disAbility Resources:
http://www.makoa.org
Please Help: Inkjet & Toner Cartridge Recycling

Reply via email to