More of this is what you can expect if Hillary gets her way with
universal government run health care.
On Mar 3, 2007, at 3:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During the vietnam war it became a habit to undercut vets
healthcare so Washington could make the war seem like it was the
fault of a bunch of privates that we were there at all. We didn't
just mistreat the healthy vets from that war. I think most of us
understand that reguardless of how we feel about the war, our
soldiers are doing their duty and should expect our best efforts
when that causes them a disability.
I would like to see them get jobs in Washington DC where nobody
gets off their butts anyway. Loss of memory seems to be a job
requirement when doing paperwork, too. It's a shame we need a war
to get a new batch of bureaucrats, but I've written to encourage
hiring disabled vets instead of mentally challenged relatives.
john
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 4:07 PM
Subject: [QUAD-L] VA Hospitals
In a message dated 3/3/2007 3:04:17 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm late in reading this post, but just this week I read that
Defense Secretary Gates has called the Army's treatment and care of
its wounded soldiers at Walter Reed Medical Center as
"unacceptable." The Army is taking this as a very serious matter
and heads are already starting to roll. It is about time the
military takes a serious look at their health care and makes some
real changes.
This information has been kept from the soldiers on the front lines
too. Can you imagine the moral of any soldier going into combat
knowing that the cheap contractor is providing those services too?
W
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's
free from AOL at AOL.com.
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's
free from AOL at AOL.com.
