If Canadian or British health care was based on Medicare as a model, they would 
both have a surplus. Nobody ever wants to discuss Germany's healthcare or 
Sweden, or Denmark, or even Japan. These are all successful and their life 
expectancy is higher than Americans. America is the only country where a triage 
question includes insurance type. To say socialized medicine doesn't work is 
simply denying reality. 
A major outlay of funds for hospitals is to keep huge legal staffs on hand, not 
just for lawsuits, but to find new ways to force money out of insurance and 
Medicare. Insurance companies and Medicare hire lawyers to avoid paying medical 
costs and create new codes every few years so nobody understands them in time 
to bill them properly for 6 months.
With all the lawyers involved, how about we cut all health care payments to 
lawyers by 10 percent until the budget is balanced. I also think a jury should 
be able to fine people and their lawyers that bring frivolous lawsuits against 
Dr.s and hospitals. Ask any doctor and they will tell you that malpractice 
insurance is a major health care cost. we are at a point where we will need to 
decide if we want a healths system or feed an insurance parasite. Some studies 
have concluded that between 40-65 percent of health care is just insurance. We 
are SHEEP! 
john

 
----- Original Message ----
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 9:57:00 AM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Re: Medicare Racketeers

Back in the 1960s, Claude Castonguay chaired a Canadian government committee 
studying health reform and recommended that his home province of Quebec — then 
the largest and most affluent in the country — adopt government-administered 
health care, covering all citizens through tax levies. 
The government followed his advice, leading to his modern-day moniker: "the 
father of Quebec medicare." Even this title seems modest; Castonguay's work 
triggered a domino effect across the country, until eventually his ideas were 
implemented from coast to coast. 
Four decades later, as the chairman of a government committee reviewing Quebec 
health care this year, Castonguay concluded that the system is in "crisis."
"We thought we could resolve the system's problems by rationing services or 
injecting massive amounts of new money into it," says Castonguay. But now he 
prescribes a radical overhaul: "We are proposing to give a greater role to the 
private sector so that people can exercise freedom of choice." 
Canadian-Health-Care
 
Einstein once said The height of insanity is doing the same thing over and over 
again and expecting different results. 
 
Both the Canadian and the British national health care systems are literally 
medical disasters--and also monetary black holes.
Plus they are losing all of their finest doctors who don't want to work for 
peanuts.
Those who can afford it, seek medical care out of country.
 
The US life expectancy just increased to 78 years; Canada's fell to 75 years 
and Britain's to 73 years.
Does this not tell you that we are doing something right?
 
In a message dated 6/27/2008 9:35:17 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] writes:
                Bad news for persons with disabilities and elderly.
 
In July 1, doctors will get a 10 percent payment cut, a disaster for both 
patients and doctors that the bill would have averted. None of the senators' 
excuses for this vote hold water:
                    
The bill was a partisan exercise. Not so. The bill passed 355 to 59, a 
veto-proof majority, in the House of Representatives. More Republicans voted 
for HR. 6331 than against it.            
President Bush would have vetoed it anyway. So what? If enough Republican 
senators put the interests of people with Medicare ahead of their loyalty to 
President Bush, there would have been enough votes to override a veto in the 
Senate.  
              
Senators will be back home attending fundraisers and marching in Independence 
Day parades. We need to tell them to show a little more independence from 
President Bush and a little more backbone to the insurance company lobbyists. 
Medicare belongs to the American people. It is not a racket for the insurance 
industry. 
        
 

  
        
Asclepios
Your Weekly Medicare Consumer Advocacy Update
        
        
Medicare Racketeers
        
June 27, 2008; Volume 8, Issue 26
                
The Medicare bill defeated in the Senate last night would have improved 
coverage for mental health and preventive services and helped pay medical and 
drug costs for more people with Medicare living on fixed incomes. The Bush 
administration objected to these improvements, which were paid for with a 
modest cut to some of the excessive subsidies Medicare pays to insurance 
companies. Administration officials opposed this reduction in subsidies, they 
claim, because it would result in reduced benefits for people with Medicare 
enrolled in private health plans offered by these companies. 
        
Translation: No one gets better Medicare benefits unless our pals in the 
insurance industry get a cut off the top.
        
It's as if the Medicare program had been taken over by Mafia goons.
        
Numerous independent, nonpartisan studies have shown it cost taxpayers 
substantially more—about $1,000 a head, according to one study—to provide 
coverage through a Medicare private health plan instead of through Original 
Medicare.
        
Just this week, the Government Accountability Office reported that, in 2005, 
insurance companies pocketed as profit $1.14 billion in subsidies that the 
companies had told Medicare would go toward medical benefits. 
        
Last night, 39 Republican senators joined President Bush in opposing HR. 6331, 
the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act. As a result, the 
benefit improvements in HR. 6331 will not take effect, and on July 1, doctors 
will get a 10 percent payment cut, a disaster for both patients and doctors 
that the bill would have averted. None of the senators' excuses for this vote 
hold water:
                    
The bill was a partisan exercise. Not so. The bill passed 355 to 59, a 
veto-proof majority, in the House of Representatives. More Republicans voted 
for HR. 6331 than against it.            
President Bush would have vetoed it anyway. So what? If enough Republican 
senators put the interests of people with Medicare ahead of their loyalty to 
President Bush, there would have been enough votes to override a veto in the 
Senate.  
              
Next week, these senators will be back home attending fundraisers and marching 
in Independence Day parades. We need to tell them to show a little more 
independence from President Bush and a little more backbone to the insurance 
company lobbyists. Medicare belongs to the American people. It is not a racket 
for the insurance industry. 
        

Medical Record   
     
Senate vote to invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed on HR. 6331 fell short 
of the 60 votes needed. Yea votes indicate support for passage of HR. 6331. No 
votes indicate opposition. Majority Leader Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, 
voted No to preserve the right to bring the bill up for a vote again (Roll Call 
vote on HR. 6331 
(http://www.kintera.org/TR.asp?a=hhKWI5OFLdIPKcJ&s=qtJ3JcMJJbKWJ7MSF&m=guKSIaMVKkL2F&af=y),
 June 2008).
        
"On average, [Medicare Advantage] organizations' self-reported actual profit 
margin was 5.1 percent of total revenue, which is approximately $1.14 billion 
more in profits in 2005 than [Medicare Advantage] organizations projected" 
("Medicare Advantage Organizations: Actual Expenses and Profits Compared to 
Projections for 2005 
(http://www.kintera.org/TR.asp?a=kkI2JePRKgLWImI&s=qtJ3JcMJJbKWJ7MSF&m=guKSIaMVKkL2F&af=y),"
 Government Accountability Office, June 2008). 
        
"I am an elder advocate with an Area Agency on Aging. Even though several 
Medicare Advantage plans, including four PFFS plans, are listed as plans 
accepted in our county, that is actually not the case. Once a beneficiary 
enrolls in one of these Advantage plans, they find out that providers in this 
county actually do not accept the plans. If the beneficiary cannot see a 
provider in this county, they are forced to leave the county to find providers. 
Some have to drive 50, 100 and 200 miles to see a provider, or get their 
prescriptions, because there are no providers in our county who will accept 
their plan. Many of these elderly people can't drive because they have poor 
eyesight, dementia, etc. These elderly beneficiaries come to our Area Agency on 
Aging to get out of these Medicare Advantage plans because the local hospital 
and their doctors will not accept the plans" (Story submitted to the Private 
Health Plan Monitoring Project
 
(http://www.kintera.org/TR.asp?a=ddJOKTNpE9KJK2L&s=qtJ3JcMJJbKWJ7MSF&m=guKSIaMVKkL2F&af=y)
 from Spencer, Iowa, Medicare Rights Center, April 2007). 
                
* * * *

Medicare Part D Appeals Help for Advocates is here!                   

MRC's new Medicare Part D Appeals: An advocate's manual to navigating the 
Medicare private drug plan appeals process offers an easy-to-understand, 
comprehensive overview of the entire appeals process, including real-life case 
examples, a glossary of important appeals terms, a sample protocol for 
advocates, and links to important resources.
         
Download a FREE copy 
(http://www.kintera.org/TR.asp?a=hrKWI1OELmIQK7J&s=qtJ3JcMJJbKWJ7MSF&m=guKSIaMVKkL2F&af=y)
 of this great resource.        

* * * *

Medicare Part D Monitoring Project                         
The Medicare Rights Center (MRC) would like to hear about your experience, or 
that of someone you know, enrolled in a Medicare private drug plan. With 
information about what the issues are with Medicare Part D, we will be able to 
demand that those problems be fixed.
        
Submit your story at http://www.medicarerights.org/partdstories.html. 
(http://www.kintera.org/TR.asp?a=kkI2JaPQKpLXIhI&s=qtJ3JcMJJbKWJ7MSF&m=guKSIaMVKkL2F&af=y)
 
        
* * * *

The Louder Our Voice, the Stronger Our Message                 

Asclepios —named for the Greek and Roman god of medicine who, acclaimed for his 
healing abilities, was at one point the most worshipped god in Greece—is a 
weekly e-newsletter designed to keep you up-to-date with Medicare program and 
policy issues, and advance advocacy strategies to address them. Please help 
build awareness of key Medicare consumer issues by forwarding this action alert 
to your friends and encouraging them to subscribe today 
(http://www.kintera.org/TR.asp?a=ddJOKPNoEiKKKXL&s=qtJ3JcMJJbKWJ7MSF&m=guKSIaMVKkL2F&af=y). 
                         

* * * *         

The Medicare Rights Center (MRC) is the largest independent source of Medicare 
information and assistance in the United States. Founded in 1989, MRC helps 
older adults and people with disabilities get good, affordable health care.    
     
Visit our online subscription form to sign up for Asclepios at 
http://www.medicarerights.org/subscribeframeset.html 
(http://www.kintera.org/TR.asp?a=gqLUKYOAKlJRI7K&s=qtJ3JcMJJbKWJ7MSF&m=guKSIaMVKkL2F&af=y).
    

To unsubscribe from this mailing, please go to 
http://www.kintera.org/TR.asp?a=hhKWI5OFLeIPKbJ&s=qtJ3JcMJJbKWJ7MSF&m=guKSIaMVKkL2F

To modify your profile and subscription preferences, please click go to 
http://www.kintera.org/TR.asp?a=kkI2JePRKhLWIlI&s=qtJ3JcMJJbKWJ7MSF&m=guKSIaMVKkL2F


 




________________________________
Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars.




________________________________
Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars.


      

Reply via email to