Did you find a solution for bladder atrophy and the bladder wrapping around
the catheter?


On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Quadius <[email protected]> wrote:

> I had some problems with pain and AD whenever I've had my suprapubic. I
> found that a lot of the problems were occurring because the catheter was
> rubbing against the back of the bladder. Have you tried tethering the
> catheter to your belly so that it doesn't slide into the bladder too far?
> You might also have a problem with bladder atrophy. Mine was pretty severe
> and it would happen at least once or twice a day that the catheter would
> stop draining  because the bladder had wrapped around the catheter.
> Q
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Feb 5, 2014, at 9:34 AM, Fragile <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I've been having trouble with AD for the past 14 months after having a SP
> cath put in.  The first few days after the catheter is changed, AD occurs
> every 10 minutes or so.  Transferring in and out of my chair also sets it
> off.  When getting dressed, any contact to the groin area also sets it
> off.  The only thing that gets rid of it is to lay on my side. Blood
> pressure gets up to 180/120.  Local Doctors are clueless.  The supposed
> "good" doctors are 3 hours away, I'm afraid of trying to travel that far.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Gmail <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I had a very bad AD "episode" back in 1986 before anybody knew what it
>> was and what he signs are.
>> I was hospitalized for severe headache's, they ended up putting an
>> elderly woman who was almost complexly deaf in my room. Every person who
>> came to communicate with her had to SHOUT!
>> It ended up having a full blown stroke on my right side. I couldn't speak
>> or move my left arm. Then I threw-up bile which was a clear indicator that
>> my gallbladder was very bad. After they removed it I got my speech back and
>> could move my left arm again ... I am SO LUCKY!
>> As a result of the stroke I have some long-term memory loss.
>> Bobbie
>>
>> Smile Everyday
>>
>
>

Reply via email to