+1, plus the issue that the various daemons may no longer be isolated from each other due to this shm,
Dinesh On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: > > My basic opinion is that shm interfaces end up being painful for various > reasons, including portability but also leaving shm segments around. > Since this is control plane, and sockets are fast anyway, I don't see > any reason to get wrapped up in shm. > > _______________________________________________ > Quagga-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
